﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<modsCollection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3">
<mods ID="searle-etal-2020-experimental">
    <titleInfo>
        <title>Experimental Evaluation and Development of a Silver-Standard for the MIMIC-III Clinical Coding Dataset</title>
    </titleInfo>
    <name type="personal">
        <namePart type="given">Thomas</namePart>
        <namePart type="family">Searle</namePart>
        <role>
            <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
        </role>
    </name>
    <name type="personal">
        <namePart type="given">Zina</namePart>
        <namePart type="family">Ibrahim</namePart>
        <role>
            <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
        </role>
    </name>
    <name type="personal">
        <namePart type="given">Richard</namePart>
        <namePart type="family">Dobson</namePart>
        <role>
            <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
        </role>
    </name>
    <originInfo>
        <dateIssued>2020-jul</dateIssued>
    </originInfo>
    <typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
    <relatedItem type="host">
        <titleInfo>
            <title>Proceedings of the 19th SIGBioMed Workshop on Biomedical Language Processing</title>
        </titleInfo>
        <originInfo>
            <publisher>Association for Computational Linguistics</publisher>
            <place>
                <placeTerm type="text">Online</placeTerm>
            </place>
        </originInfo>
        <genre authority="marcgt">conference publication</genre>
    </relatedItem>
    <abstract>Clinical coding is currently a labour-intensive, error-prone, but a critical administrative process whereby hospital patient episodes are manually assigned codes by qualified staff from large, standardised taxonomic hierarchies of codes. Automating clinical coding has a long history in NLP research and has recently seen novel developments setting new benchmark results. A popular dataset used in this task is MIMIC-III, a large database of clinical free text notes and their associated codes amongst other data. We argue for the reconsideration of the validity MIMIC-III’s assigned codes, as MIMIC-III has not undergone secondary validation. This work presents an open-source, reproducible experimental methodology for assessing the validity of EHR discharge summaries. We exemplify the methodology with MIMIC-III discharge summaries and show the most frequently assigned codes in MIMIC-III are undercoded up to 35%.</abstract>
    <identifier type="citekey">searle-etal-2020-experimental</identifier>
    <location>
        <url>https://www.aclweb.org/anthology/2020.bionlp-1.8</url>
    </location>
    <part>
        <date>2020-jul</date>
        <extent unit="page">
            <start>76</start>
            <end>85</end>
        </extent>
    </part>
</mods>
</modsCollection>
